0%
AI SECURITY & GOVERNANCE

Ship AI your lawyers and your CISO can sign off.

AI systems fail differently: they can be talked into ignoring their instructions, they can leak the data they were grounded on, and regulators now have opinions about both. Dezvo builds the security and governance layer around your AI — injection defence, compliance mapping, red-teaming, and the audit trail that turns “trust us” into evidence.

See Our Work
Coverage
  • Prompt injection defence
  • EU AI Act / GDPR / DPDP mapping
  • Red-teaming & adversarial testing
  • PII redaction & data controls
  • Audit logs & usage monitoring
WHAT IS AI GOVERNANCE?

Rules, controls, and proof — not paperwork.

AI governance is the set of policies and technical controls that keep AI systems safe, lawful, and accountable: who may use AI for what, what data may reach a model, where human oversight is mandatory, and how every decision is logged. AI security is its technical enforcement — defending against prompt injection, data leakage, jailbreaks, and abuse.

Regulation has made this concrete: the EU AI Act phases in obligations through 2026-2027, India's DPDP Act governs the personal data your AI touches, and sector rules apply on top. The good news: for most companies, proportionate governance is a few weeks of focused work — not a compliance department.

WHAT WE COVER

Security and governance, as one system.

Responsible AI & compliance

Usage policies, human-oversight rules, and risk classification mapped to the EU AI Act, GDPR, and India's DPDP Act — sized to your actual risk tier.

Prompt injection protection

Layered defence: input screening, privilege separation (the model never holds credentials), output validation, and tool-call allowlists with approval gates.

Red-teaming

Structured adversarial testing of your AI features — jailbreaks, data-extraction attempts, tool abuse — with findings ranked by exploitability and fixed, then retested.

Audit & monitoring

Every AI interaction logged with user attribution, PII-leak scanning on outputs, anomaly alerts, and quarterly governance reviews that take hours, not weeks.

FAQ

Common questions, answered.

If your question isn't here, message us — usually same-day reply.

Prompt injection is when attacker-controlled text — in a user message, an email, or a document your AI reads — overrides the system's instructions. A poisoned document can tell your assistant to exfiltrate data or misuse its tools. It matters because it's the top-ranked LLM security risk (OWASP LLM01) and standard web security doesn't catch it. Defence is architectural: least-privilege tools, output validation, and human gates on sensitive actions.

If you serve EU users or your AI outputs are used in the EU, likely yes — obligations phase in through 2026-2027 and depend on your risk tier. Most business AI (assistants, automation, search) lands in minimal or limited-risk tiers requiring transparency and documentation rather than heavy conformity assessment. We map your systems to the right tier and produce the required documentation — typically a 2-3 week exercise.

1-2 weeks against your live or staging AI features: systematic jailbreak attempts, indirect injection via documents and data sources, tool-abuse scenarios, and data-extraction probes. You get a ranked findings report (exploitability × impact), fixes for each, and a retest confirming they hold. We recommend it before any customer-facing AI launch and after major changes.

Yes. Traditional audits cover your infrastructure and code; AI adds failure modes they don't test: injection through natural language, training-data and retrieval leakage, model manipulation, and unsafe tool use. Your existing audit remains necessary — the AI security layer sits on top of it, and we integrate with whatever security process you already run.
RELATED SERVICES

Bundle the services that work together.

Currently accepting projects

Ready to get started?

Tell us where you're at. Scope, quote, and timeline back within 24 hours.